[PATCH] cygcheck -s should not imply -d

[Christopher Faylor]

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 01:51:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jan  5 19:50, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>> 
>> Currently, for cygcheck -s implies -d.  This seems rather unhelpful.
>> 
>> I'm afraid I've lost the thread which inspired this, but in it the reporter
>> provided cygcheck -svr output as requested, but this did not help diagnose
>> what ultimately turned out to be the problem, that a DLL was actually an older
>> version (presumably due to replace-in-use problems)
>> 
>> Attached a patch to modify cygcheck so -s no longer implies -d (although -d
>> can still be used).
>> 
>
>> 
>> 2011-01-05  Jon TURNEY
>> 
>> 	* cygcheck.cc (main): don't imply -d from -s option to cygcheck
>
>Looks good to me.  Applied.

Sorry that I didn't reply to this.  I wasn't 100% convinced that this
was a good idea since some of the packages show up as having problems
when they are ok.  I was wondering if that would end up generating more
(understandably) confused mailing list traffic but I guess, in the end,
it probably is better to check the validity of the packages for the
prescribed error reporting technique.

cgf