[Patch] cygcheck: warn about empty path-components
Corinna Vinschen
vinschen@redhat.com
Mon Oct 11 08:58:00 GMT 2004
On Oct 9 19:18, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> When I was at Red Hat, I tended to be slightly more lenient about
> assignment obligations for things in the utils directory.
I certainly don't object if we keep it this way.
> Corinna, do you think you could ask you-know-who if we could get a
> waiver for cygcheck changes? It doesn't seem like cygcheck provides
> any core cygwin functionality.
>
> We might even consider changing the license if Red Hat is amenable.
I've written a mail to you-know-who (I guess it's the same you-know-who
as the you-know-who you were thinking of), asking if we can change the
licensing of the utils directory to something relaxed (BSD, actually).
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the Cygwin-patches
mailing list