[PATCH] pthread_equal
Thomas Pfaff
tpfaff@gmx.net
Thu Mar 20 07:29:00 GMT 2003
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 00:54, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> > 2003-03-19 Thomas Pfaff <tpfaff@gmx.net>
> >
> > * pthread.cc (pthread_equal): Replacement for pthread_equal in
> > thread.cc.
> > * thread.cc: Rename pthread_equal to pthread::equal throughout.
> > (pthread_equal): Remove.
> > * thread.h (pthread::equal): New static method.
>
> This seems mostly pointless to me.
>
> A few notes:
>
> Why use a static method? you'll always have one pthread to compare to ,
> so using operator == is appropriate. In fact, operator == already does
> the right thing as it is the entire contents of pthread_equal.
>
> So: where pthread_equal is used internally, you could switch to (for
> instance)
> ==
> if (&thread == joiner)
> ==
The only reason for this patch is to give the compiler the opportunity to
do some inline optimizations. Without it it will always issue a function
call only to test for equality of two pointers.
Thomas
More information about the Cygwin-patches
mailing list