access () and path.cc

[Pierre A. Humblet]

At 12:56 AM 2/28/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:49:59AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>OK, following Chris' remarks here is a much smaller set
>>of changes.
>
>Do you think it would make sense to do something along the lines
>of:
>>+      path_conv pc (cfd->is_device ? cfd->get_name () :
cfd->get_win32_name (), PC_SYM_NOFOLLOW);

I guess one could but judging from the times I see in 
strace it's not really justified.

On the other hand that's something that we could look 
at after you integrate your code. There could eventually
be a single get_name returning what's appropriate.

Pierre