Wed Apr 19 21:47:00 GMT 2000
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 08:43:39AM +0400, Vadim Egorov wrote:
>Chris Faylor <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 08:33:35AM +0400, Vadim Egorov wrote:
>> >Chris Faylor <email@example.com> writes:
>>>>On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 11:47:12PM +0300, Vadim Egorov wrote:
>>>>>One more way is to borow it -- glibc contains quite compact and
>>>>>independent one -- though I'm not quite sure about cygwin policy in
>>>>We can't borrow from glibc due to license considerations,
>>>>unfortunately. BSD, on the other hand...
>>>As I found both FreeBSD and glibc contain the same code of inet_network
>>>(with slightest diffs).
>>There should be no problem using BSD code. We use it in other places
>Then I'll try it. Is it a better solution then using undocumented
If the undocumented feature is in W95, W98, NT4, and NT2000, then, no. I
don't think it is a better solution, unless it is a miniscule amount of code.
More information about the Cygwin-patches