malloc crash

Ken Brown
Mon Oct 25 22:02:22 GMT 2021

On 10/25/2021 5:29 PM, Mark Geisert wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Oct 25 08:35, Ken Brown wrote:
>>> On 10/25/2021 4:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>> Has the thread already been started at this point?
>>> Yes, here's the backtrace of that thread:
>>> Thread 5 (Thread 9692.0x7c4c):
>>> #0  0x00000001801934f9 in sys_alloc (m=0x18036f860 <_gm_>, nb=1040) at
>>> ../../../../temp/winsup/cygwin/
>>> #1  0x0000000180196b96 in dlmalloc (bytes=1024) at
>>> ../../../../temp/winsup/cygwin/
>>> #2  0x00000001801993e1 in dlrealloc (oldmem=0x0, bytes=1024) at
>>> ../../../../temp/winsup/cygwin/
>>> #3  0x00000001800e8eed in realloc (p=0x0, size=1024) at
>>> ../../../../temp/winsup/cygwin/
>> Er... huh?  So both threads are in a malloc function?  This shouldn't
>> have happened, given the clunky muto guarding malloc calls.  This is
>> really strange.  Why's the muto not working here?
> Is it possible both threads have executed malloc_init()?
> If so, the second one would reinit the muto.

Or does the fifo_reader thread call a malloc function before the main thread has 
called malloc_init()?  This would presumably cause __malloc_lock() to fail, but 
there's no error check.


More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list