data and bss tests in dll_list::alloc
Christopher Faylor
cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com
Wed Feb 8 15:21:00 GMT 2012
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:54:19PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>I just fixed a typo in the fabort calls in dll_list::alloc. But in
>fact I'm wondering if we really need the extensive data_start/data_end/
>bss_start/bss_end tests. The reason is simple. All DLL segments are
>always loaded into adjacent addresses, always in the order given by the
>DLL segement information.
If that is the case can we simplify the child_copy operation? That
would speed up fork slightly.
>And given that, we don't even have to compare data and bss addresses at
>all. The HINSTANCE is the address of the module. Just compare it to
>the stored d->handle and if they are not identical, we're done, right?
>
>Or am I missing something?
Don't think so.
cgf
More information about the Cygwin-developers
mailing list