upset vs. genini, release-2 hint files [Was: Re: More: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty]
Thu May 28 23:02:00 GMT 2009
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 07:00:47PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:38:22PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>#1) should upset also be made strict (which would mean a massive audit
>>of release-2 setup.hint files, and perhaps also an audit of the actual
>>.tar.bz2 files under release-2)
>No, upset specifically doesn't care if source files are missing.
>>#2) OR, should genini be made more lax, like upset?
>Why not add an option?
Oh, and what does this have to do with cygwin-developers? This seems like
More information about the Cygwin-developers