cygwin_lock_lock strace output

Corinna Vinschen vinschen@redhat.com
Fri Dec 10 16:19:00 GMT 2004


On Dec 10 17:19, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Does anybody hate the
> 
>   __cygwin_lock_unlock: threadcount 1.  not unlocking
>   __cygwin_lock_lock: threadcount 1.  not locking
> 
> strace messages as much as I do?  Is it really necessary to print them
> all the time?
> 
> To put it in other words, would it hurt people badly if we change the
> default strace mask so that the _STRACE_PARANOID flag isn't set anymore
> as in
> 
>   if (!mask)
>     mask = _STRACE_ALL & ~_STRACE_PARANOID

Which doesn't work that way of course.  But you get the idea.


Corinna



More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list