PLEASE TEST: New implementation of blocking socket I/O

Nicholas Wourms
Thu Apr 1 19:48:00 GMT 2004

vinschen wrote:

> On Apr  1 12:12, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>>vinschen wrote:
>>>>On Mar 30 20:53, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>>>Please have a look. 
>>>Grrr, gcc doesn't emit these warnings with optimization off.
>>Speaking of warnings, has anyone tried building with CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS set 
>>to "-W -Wall -pedantic" lately?  ;-)
> What about sending patches instead, if that's such an urgent problem
> for you?  After all you're on cygwin-*developers* here, right?

Well I'm not the one who was complaining about the lack of relevant 
warnings.  You seemed frustrated, so I offered a suggestion disguised as 
a rhetorical question.  However, if I get some extra time, I'll try 
looking into them.  I think we can all agree that while -Wall is pretty 
thorough, -W and -pedantic also catch the not-so-obvious corner-cases, 
too.  Perhaps investigating the cause of the additional warnings 
triggered by those flags might be fruitful in one's attempt to solve the 
current outstanding issues?  Just my opinion...


More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list