PLEASE TEST: New implementation of blocking socket I/O

[Nicholas Wourms]

vinschen wrote:

> On Apr  1 12:12, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> 
>>vinschen wrote:
>>
>>>>On Mar 30 20:53, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>>>Please have a look. 
>>>
>>>Grrr, gcc doesn't emit these warnings with optimization off.
>>
>>Speaking of warnings, has anyone tried building with CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS set 
>>to "-W -Wall -pedantic" lately?  ;-)
> 
> 
> What about sending patches instead, if that's such an urgent problem
> for you?  After all you're on cygwin-*developers* here, right?

Well I'm not the one who was complaining about the lack of relevant 
warnings.  You seemed frustrated, so I offered a suggestion disguised as 
a rhetorical question.  However, if I get some extra time, I'll try 
looking into them.  I think we can all agree that while -Wall is pretty 
thorough, -W and -pedantic also catch the not-so-obvious corner-cases, 
too.  Perhaps investigating the cause of the additional warnings 
triggered by those flags might be fruitful in one's attempt to solve the 
current outstanding issues?  Just my opinion...

Cheers,
Nicholas