[email@example.com: Re: ENOTSOCK errors with cygwin dll 1.3.21 and 1.3.22]
Thu May 29 03:33:00 GMT 2003
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 03:05:04PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 02:37:10PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > However, what if it's just the wrong parameter? Come to think of it,
> > the 2nd parameter is the own process id. What if the access to the own
> > process is limited from the unpriv'ed users perspective?
> > The next try would be to change the access to the process handle, right?
> Uh, well, that leaves an interesting problem. The function gets the
> process *id*, so how to change the access to the process when no
> handle is involved...
Wanna see something funny?
This is from October 2001. The posting never got a reply. Especially
look for the poster and the described workaround...
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the Cygwin-developers