key64_t? ino64_t?

Corinna Vinschen
Wed May 14 08:39:00 GMT 2003

On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 02:36:44AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> What do you think of the attached patch?  (The comments explain my
> rationale).

Except that you mistyped my name, the idea is fine.  We should remove
the old implementation entirely.  I don't want to see the 
__CYGWIN_USE_BIG_TYPES__ macro used in the Cygwin sources.  They should
always be type clean and not behave differently dependent of the setting
of __CYGWIN_USE_BIG_TYPES__.  Either we provide ftok and ftok64 or we
just replace ftok.  Since ftok wasn't exported at all, I'm voting for
just using the new implementation.


Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                      
Red Hat, Inc.

More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list