threads and signals

Thomas Pfaff tpfaff@gmx.net
Fri May 9 15:18:00 GMT 2003


Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 04:27:04PM +0200, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> 
>>As i already described in
>>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2003-q2/msg00076.html the current
>>signal implementation does not work very well with multithreaded apps.
>>
>>Before i start sending patches i would like to know if there is any
>>interest besides me for a change ?
> 
> As I'm sure you know -- this is a huge undertaking.  That's why it is
> not implemented.

I think that it wouldn't make too much sense to start with it before the 
next cygwin release.
And it might make the current CVS unstable for a longer period, 
therefore i think it is better to create a separate CVS branch for these 
changes.

Thomas



More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list