Delaying 1.3.21 [was Re: Winsock closesocket() problem] (FAQ alert)

Christopher Faylor cgf@redhat.com
Thu Mar 6 20:48:00 GMT 2003


On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 03:48:13PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> 
>> On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 01:20:45PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>> >Jason's problem is specific to a very peculiar setup and the only
>> >visible effects seem to be extra log entries.
>> >
>> >I would not delay 1.3.21 just waiting for this to be resolved.
>> 
>> Ok.  Thanks for the clarification.  Much appreciated.
>
>YAW.
>
>Here is another clarification
>>> cd /
>>> chmod -R a+r .
>>> chmod -R a+x bin sbin usr/sbin usr/local/bin lib/gcc-lib
>>> 
>
>>This is supposed to be fixed in 1.3.21, so we can hold off on the FAQ.
>
>1.3.21 will fix some of those but in lots of cases stat will still show
>that files installed by setup are not accessible.

Oh, right.

>Fixing the bulk of those awaits the soon/future/eventual setup.exe with
>ntsec patch.
>Even then I fear there will be remaining cases (wait and see).
>So a FAQ entry would not hurt.

Ok.  David, are you listening?  The very least the above should do no
harm -- other than to make some header files executable.  I guess it
really should be:

chmod -R a+x bin sbin usr/sbin usr/local/bin lib/gcc-lib/*.exe

cgf

>I was also thinking that cygcheck could "getfacl /bin".



More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list