Cygdaemon - planning

Christopher Faylor cgf@redhat.com
Tue Jul 1 19:58:00 GMT 2003


On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 02:37:30PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 02:23:28PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
>> >On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >
>> >> I read Elfyn's reply as saying that the layout would stay intermixed with the
>> >> cygwin directory.  I think I've tried to fight this battle before and grudgingly
>> >> accepted that cygdaemon lives in the cygwin directory.  I thought that if we
>> >> were moving things around I could maybe get things organized the way I'd
>> >> like them.  Guess not.
>> >
>> >I'm testing, tweaking and improving my heap implementation. I'll have it
>> >finished this evening. Before I send the patch, should I shuffle the cygdaemon
>> >stuff around into it's own directory?
>>
>> I'd prefer one patch for one thing.
>>
>> If you want, I can make the changes in CVS, "moving" whatever files you tell me
>> to a new directory.
>>
>> cgf
>
>OK, hows this?
>
>winsup/cygwin/
>  cygserver.cc                   -> winsup/cygdaemon/cygdaemon.cc
>  cygserver_client.cc            -> ``            ''/client.cc
>  cygserver_ipc.h                -> ``            ''/cygdaemon_ipc.h
>  cygserver_process.cc           -> ``            ''/cygdaemon_process.cc
>  cygserver_shm.cc               -> ``            ''/cygdaemon_shm.cc
>  cygserver_shm.h                -> ``            ''/cygdaemon_smh.h
>  cygserver_transport.cc         -> ``            ''/transport.cc
>  cygserver_transport_pipes.cc   -> ``            ''/transport_pipes.cc
>  cygserver_transport_sockets.cc -> ``            ''/transport_sockets.cc

Why are we calling it "cygdaemon"?  I thought we were referring to it as
"cygserver"?

cgf



More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list