cygwin=ntsec:[no]strict

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:34:28PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:11:05PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>> >Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >
>> >> Should we have cygcheck run 'id'?
>> >
>> >Yes
>> 
>> Ok.  I'm adding that now.
>
>Chris,
>
>Please make sure id runs with ntsec even if cygcheck
>runs with CYGWIN=nontsec.

Ok.  Thanks.  I never would have thought of this.

Does it make sense to run it both with and without ntsec or is only ntsec
interesting?

cgf