/cygdrive in CVS? Time for 1.5.6 soon.
Corinna Vinschen
vinschen@redhat.com
Mon Dec 1 18:38:00 GMT 2003
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 01:23:47PM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> Actually, you might want check this against the original LTP source. If
> you look at the original, I think it makes more sense (at least to me),
> since this logic was setting the l_type based on the size of a counter
> in a for loop. Breifly, this is a portion of the difference as compared
> to our version 0f fcntl09:
>
> <<<diff -u fcntl09.c.ltp fcntl09.c.cygwin>>>
> for (lc=0; TESTLOOPING
> - int type;
> - for (type = 0, type < 2; type++){
>
> Tst_count=0;
>
> - flocks.l_type = type ? F_RDLCK : F_WRLCK;
> + flocks.l_type = F_RDLCK : F_WRLCK;
Yes, that makes a lot more sense. Interested to submit a patch?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the Cygwin-developers
mailing list