ok, the daemon has had feedback...

[Christopher Faylor]

On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 02:47:35PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>which was: no impact when not running, broke tty's when running.
>
>I've fixed the tty issue.... so
>
>what next to get this accepted/further work required defined?

Anyone actually looked at the changes and evaluated the implementation?

I'd hoped for a little bit more actual testing, too.

Gary, are you using this on a day-to-day basis?

cgf