Fri Apr 19 17:11:00 GMT 2002
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 10:09 AM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: committers?
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:22:33AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >I'm confused. You have, on a fairly often basis, lamented the fact
> >that no-one other than you and Corinna seems to take
> responsibility for
> >reviewing cygwin patches and changes. You seem to be
> indicating that
> >you want more input into cygwin. Yet when I do just that,
> on a patch
> >that is certainly not harmful (while maybe not optimal). I didn't
> >realise I was overstepping boundaries when I checked it in, so I'd
> >appreciate it if you could restate those so I don't do so in future.
> I don't know if you follow the gdb mailing list but it has
> the concept of "maintainership". We don't have anything as
> formal here but I thought it was understood that only Corinna
> and I have blanket checkin privileges.
> I thought I'd explicitly said that anything thread-related
> was in your domain. And, I may have said that tty related
> stuff was ok for Egor.
Ok, understood. Thanks.
I'll follow the patch details on the patch list.
More information about the Cygwin-developers