Fri Apr 19 16:13:00 GMT 2002
It would help if my email parsed.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Collins
> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 8:23 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: committers?
> I'm confused. You have, on a fairly often basis,
> lamented the fact that no-one other than you and Corinna
> seems to take responsibility for reviewing cygwin patches and
> changes. You seem to be indicating that you want more input
> into cygwin. Yet when I do just that, on a patch that is
> certainly not harmful (while maybe not optimal)
I find I've overstepped the mark..
> .I didn't
> realise I was overstepping boundaries when I checked it in,
> so I'd appreciate it if you could restate those so I don't do
> so in future.
> >If one of the functions is obsolete, it should be deleted.
> That means
> >that the patch does *not* look good. It needs to be reviewed.
> Fine, back it out (as you did). That's not a big deal. Just
> to be clear: I'm not upset that the patch was reverted,
> simply confused.
More information about the Cygwin-developers