Robert Collins
Fri Apr 19 16:13:00 GMT 2002

It would help if my email parsed.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Collins 
> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 8:23 AM
> To:
> Subject: committers?
> Chris,
> 	I'm confused. You have, on a fairly often basis, 
> lamented the fact that no-one other than you and Corinna 
> seems to take responsibility for reviewing cygwin patches and 
> changes. You seem to be indicating that you want more input 
> into cygwin. Yet when I do just that, on a patch that is 
> certainly not harmful (while maybe not optimal)

(please insert)
 I find I've overstepped the mark..

> .I didn't 
> realise I was overstepping boundaries when I checked it in, 
> so I'd appreciate it if you could restate those so I don't do 
> so in future.
> >If one of the functions is obsolete, it should be deleted.  
> That means 
> >that the patch does *not* look good.  It needs to be reviewed.
> Fine, back it out (as you did). That's not a big deal. Just 
> to be clear: I'm not upset that the patch was reverted, 
> simply confused.
> Rob

More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list