1.1.4 vs 1.1.5 timings

Chris Faylor cgf@cygnus.com
Tue Oct 17 11:44:00 GMT 2000

On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 08:32:10AM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>--- Chris Faylor <cgf@cygnus.com> wrote:
>>I assume that this is with a recently updated version of cygwin, right?
>>There were some changes to resource accounting (cpu time) in the recent
>I was using yesterday's snapshot for the timings.

Ah.  That explains the low cpu timings then.  I don't exactly understand
why, but the newer snapshots weren't accurately reporting timings.  In
fact, AFAICT, up until now, all Cygwin DLLs were inaccurate whenever an
exec*() was used.  But, recent snapshots were even more inaccurate than
what had gone before.

So, your elapsed time figures will probably show more cpu usage with today's


More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list