1.1.4 vs 1.1.5 timings
Earnie Boyd
earnie_boyd@yahoo.com
Tue Oct 17 05:30:00 GMT 2000
As promised I have timings for the make clean and make processes:
/tmp/make-clean-1.1.4.timing
Command being timed: "make clean"
User time (seconds): 17.49
System time (seconds): 16.80
Percent of CPU this job got: 21%
Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 2:38.89
/tmp/make-clean-1.1.5.timing
Command being timed: "make clean"
User time (seconds): 10.91
System time (seconds): 12.58
Percent of CPU this job got: 21%
Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 1:48.88
/tmp/make-1.1.4.timing
Command being timed: "make"
User time (seconds): 548.72
System time (seconds): 587.28
Percent of CPU this job got: 65%
Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 28:47.32
/tmp/make-1.1.5.timing
Command being timed: "make"
User time (seconds): 495.05
System time (seconds): 558.23
Percent of CPU this job got: 55%
Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 31:38.83
It appears that 1.1.5 wins in that it's using less resources. The make has a
larger "Elapsed" time because it got less of the CPU.
Cheers,
=====
Earnie Boyd
mailto:earnie_boyd@yahoo.com
--- < http://earniesystems.safeshopper.com > ---
--- Cygwin: POSIX on Windows < http://gw32.freeyellow.com/ > ---
--- Minimalist GNU for Windows < http://www.mingw.org/ > ---
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/
More information about the Cygwin-developers
mailing list