1.1.4 vs 1.1.5 timings

Earnie Boyd earnie_boyd@yahoo.com
Tue Oct 17 05:30:00 GMT 2000


As promised I have timings for the make clean and make processes:

/tmp/make-clean-1.1.4.timing
        Command being timed: "make clean"
        User time (seconds): 17.49
        System time (seconds): 16.80
        Percent of CPU this job got: 21%
        Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 2:38.89

/tmp/make-clean-1.1.5.timing
        Command being timed: "make clean"
        User time (seconds): 10.91
        System time (seconds): 12.58
        Percent of CPU this job got: 21%
        Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 1:48.88

/tmp/make-1.1.4.timing
        Command being timed: "make"
        User time (seconds): 548.72
        System time (seconds): 587.28
        Percent of CPU this job got: 65%
        Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 28:47.32

/tmp/make-1.1.5.timing
        Command being timed: "make"
        User time (seconds): 495.05
        System time (seconds): 558.23
        Percent of CPU this job got: 55%
        Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 31:38.83

It appears that 1.1.5 wins in that it's using less resources.  The make has a
larger "Elapsed" time because it got less of the CPU.

Cheers,

=====
Earnie Boyd
mailto:earnie_boyd@yahoo.com

---         < http://earniesystems.safeshopper.com >         ---
--- Cygwin: POSIX on Windows < http://gw32.freeyellow.com/ > ---
---   Minimalist GNU for Windows < http://www.mingw.org/ >   ---

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf!  It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/


More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list