Reason for cover functions in pthread.cc

Paul K. Fisher pfisher@plexware.com
Sun May 7 20:48:00 GMT 2000


Is there a reason to keep the cover functions in pthread.cc?  These simply
call "__" prefixed versions in thread.cc, where the real implementation is
provided.

For example:
int
pthread_attr_init (pthread_attr_t * attr)
{
  return __pthread_attr_init (attr);
}


paul



More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list