Is binutils correct?

Chris Faylor
Sun Mar 19 12:25:00 GMT 2000

On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 12:14:05PM -0600, Mumit Khan wrote:
>Chris Faylor <> writes:
>> Whild downloading the most recent version of binutils and gcc from
>> the development snapshot, I noticed that the binutils date available
>> for download is older than another version that I'd downloaded from
>> Mumit's site.  The one available is:  binutils-19990818-1.tar.gz.
>> I had this sitting around in my download directory:
>> binutils-19990911.tar.gz
>> Mumit, which one should we be using.  I would think that the newer one was be
>> tter.
>19990818-1. There is relocation problems with 19990911 (look in cygwin dev
>list about `can't strip cygwin dll' after I released the first snapshot).

I remember the discussion but I thought you'd fixed the problem rather
than dropping back to an earlier version.  I guess I remembered wrong.


More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list