Changing cygwin-developers "charter"?

[Eric Christopher]

> Personally, I am happy with the status quo here but I was wondering
> if anyone else felt that we should open this up for discussions of
> things like bfd/binutils/gcc, etc.
> 

I wouldn't mind it being a discussion list for people developing ports
for cygwin.  More of a people developing the cygwin env. as opposed to
people developing with cygwin.  Make sense?

-eric