[ITA] libuninameslist-20200413-1, python-libuninameslist-0.2-1

[Lemures Lemniscati]

Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 20:46:43 +0200
From: Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps <cygwin-apps@cygwin.com>

> On 09.07.2020 14:13, Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 00:30:53 +0900
> > From: Lemures Lemniscati
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Current Cygwin packages of LibUniNamesList are very old (updated almost 7 years ago).
> >> Now, the upstream sources are maintained at https://github.com/fontforge/libuninameslist
> >> and able to treat Unicode 13.0.
> >>
> >> Cygport files are forked here: https://github.com/cygwin-lem/libuninameslist-cygport/tree/w_20200413
> >> from http://cygwin.com/git/cygwin-packages/libuninameslist .
> >>
> 
> by default we now install only the dynamic and not the static
> so you should remove/not build the
> 
> usr/lib/libuninameslist-fr.a
> usr/lib/libuninameslist.a
> 
> and install only
> 
> usr/lib/libuninameslist-fr.dll.a
> usr/lib/libuninameslist.dll.a
> 
> these should not go in the libuninameslist1
> 
> usr/share/doc/libuninameslist/AUTHORS
> usr/share/doc/libuninameslist/ChangeLog
> usr/share/doc/libuninameslist/COPYING
> usr/share/doc/libuninameslist/LICENSE
> usr/share/doc/libuninameslist/README
> 
> my suggestion, put them in the devel package.
> 
> I know that Yaakov installed them, but normally the
> library package contains only the libraries
> 
> I have not tested the python-* , but I see no reason to build the 35.
> (personal opinion)

Thank you, Macro, for reviewing !

Updated test package files are here as before:
  https://cygwin-lem.github.io/libuninameslist-cygport/index.html .

A color diff of the cygport files is attached as an HTML file.

Regards, 

Lem