Advice needed on ffcall packaging

[Ken Brown]

On 2/21/2018 12:43 AM, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2018-02-20 11:41, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> NAME=ffcall
>> ...
>> PKG_NAMES="libffcall0 libffcall-devel"
>> libffcall0_CONTENTS=...
>> libffcall_devel_OBSOLETES="ffcall"
>> libffcall_devel_CONTENTS=...
> 
> Does this generate the ("virtual") package setup entry for:
> 
> @ ffcall
> ...
> category: _obsolete
> requires: libffcall-devel

Yes.

> and does this need need to be kept in .cygport for future releases?

Probably.  In any case, it can't hurt to keep it.

Ken