[ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

[Ken Brown]

On 5/11/2016 4:35 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> I haven't moved these yet, but what about the rest of the collections? IIRC the
> TEXLIVE_ARCH_PKGS do have CPU-cygwin paths in the "sources", but are they
> *really* archful?

No, the only issue is the sources.  As it stands, if someone downloads the 
source from one arch and tries to build on the other, cygport will complain 
about missing source packages.  Of course, running 'cygport fetch' will fix 
that, so it's not a big deal.

Maybe in the future we should add the TEXLIVE_ARCH_PKGS for both CPUs to the 
sources, and then there's no issue at all.

Ken