[ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0
Marco Atzeri
marco.atzeri@gmail.com
Wed May 11 21:02:00 GMT 2016
On 11/05/2016 22:48, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2016-05-11 13:38, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>> On 11/05/2016 00:11, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>>> Package Maintainers,
>>
>>>
>>> Once you have upgraded to cygport 0.22.0, maintainers MUST email a list
>>> of their package(s) which qualify as noarch AND are already marked
>>> ARCH=noarch or will be with the next release. (Note that inheriting
>>> cross.cygclass implies ARCH=noarch.) A new release is NOT necessary
>>> just to add ARCH=noarch to the .cygport, just that it should be added
>>> locally so as to be included in the next release. We will then move
>>> these packages into /noarch/release on sourceware and acknowledge such,
>>> at which point you are clear to upload future releases.
>>>
>>> Please do not hesitate to ask if you have any questions.
>>>
>>> TIA,
>>
>> All these are arch independent as contain only scripts
>> (for the time being)
>>
>> octave-bim
>> octave-bsltl
>> octave-cgi
>> octave-data-smoothing
>> octave-dataframe
>> octave-divand
>> octave-financial
>> octave-fpl
>> octave-fuzzy-logic-toolkit
>> octave-ga
>> octave-generate_html
>> octave-geometry
>> octave-integration
>> octave-mvn
>> octave-ncarray
>> octave-optics
>> octave-queueing
>> octave-secs1d
>> octave-secs3d
>> octave-specfun
>> octave-splines
>> octave-statistics
>> octave-vrml
>
> But what about the following?
>
> octave-nan
> octave-octcdf
> octave-stk
> octave-tsa
>
/usr/lib/octave/packages/
contains the arch specific in this case in mex variant.
octave-octcdf is obsolete and empty.
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list