[ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

Yaakov Selkowitz yselkowitz@cygwin.com
Wed May 11 20:15:00 GMT 2016


On 2016-05-11 11:26, David Stacey wrote:
> On 11/05/16 07:17, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> On 2016-05-11 00:07, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>> So at this stage not the documentation subpackages, but only if all
>>> subpackages are in this category. correct ?
>>
>> At this time we are only considering those where all subpackages are
>> noarch, i.e. ARCH=noarch is (or will be) defined.
>
> Is it worth making libpoco-doc a separate package? It might be cleaner
> that way, as the documentation and source code are in different tarballs
> upstream.

Your call, it doesn't appear that anything is gained from building it 
together with poco itself.  I'd name the sources poco-doc and either:

OBSOLETES=libpoco-doc

or:

PKG_NAMES="libpoco-doc"
libpoco_doc_CONTENTS="usr/share/doc/poco/html/"

-- 
Yaakov



More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list