[ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0
David Stacey
drstacey@tiscali.co.uk
Wed May 11 16:26:00 GMT 2016
On 11/05/16 07:17, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2016-05-11 00:07, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>> So at this stage not the documentation subpackages, but only if all
>> subpackages are in this category. correct ?
>
> At this time we are only considering those where all subpackages are
> noarch, i.e. ARCH=noarch is (or will be) defined.
Is it worth making libpoco-doc a separate package? It might be cleaner
that way, as the documentation and source code are in different tarballs
upstream.
Dave.
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list