Questions on package adoption conventions

[Marco Atzeri]

On 31/10/2015 00:25, Mark Geisert wrote:
> Thanks Marco.
>
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>> On 30/10/2015 22:48, Mark Geisert wrote:
>>> Q3: What kind of external access is typically used for hosting final
>>> builds?  I've run a micro-ISP that allowed on-request FTP access, by IP
>>> address, to customers, but have not needed to run anonymous FTP to this
>>> point.  What about SSH/SFTP?  Is there such a thing as anonymous SFTP?
>>> Does HTTP and/or HTTPS access need to be provided?
>>
>> Upload instructions:
>> https://sourceware.org/cygwin-apps/package-upload.html
>
> D'oh, users download source packages from cygwin.com, of course.
>
> I was confused by the SRC_URI= line in cygutils.cygport.  Does that
> merely indicate where this package came from at the time the .cygport
> file was written, or does it denote a commitment by the maintainer to
> continue hosting the package from that URI?  If the latter, that's why I
> was asking
> about access methods.  Is SRC_URI required?

It is required by Cygport to build the package, but it can
be a dummy one.

  SRC_URI=URL/package

just tell cygport to unpack "package" if already in the
working directory.
It can be used to download the package if not available.

cygutils is a cygwin only package, so in this case the upstream
source is in the package itself, there is no real distinction.

I do not see the strict need to have a a working URL,
but you can choose as you prefer.
If you want it, cygport supports http, ftp and more.

Regards
Marco







> ..mark