Question about clisp version naming

Ken Brown kbrown@cornell.edu
Tue Mar 17 21:15:00 GMT 2015


On 3/17/2015 3:20 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Ken Brown writes:
>> Great.  Thanks for testing.  There's probably no reason for me to
>> upload a new clisp package right now (unless it would help you).  But
>> I'll give you a heads up when I'm ready to do that.
>
> I've now drilled to the bottom of what I had assumed were build/package
> problems… it turns out that if you rebase the lisp.dll, then the dumped
> executable that depends on it stops working.

I'll study the clisp code that creates dumped executables and see if I 
can figure out what's going on.

> rebase has altered lisp.dll even
> though it says it didn't.

This sounds like a bug in rebase, but it probably isn't related to the 
present problem.

Ken



More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list