Question about clisp version naming

[Yaakov Selkowitz]

On Sun, 2015-03-15 at 13:37 -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
> This sounds like a packaging error on my part.  First of all, lisp.dll 
> is new with the latest clisp; it was part of my solution to the dynamic 
> loading problem.  But from what you say, it sounds like I should put it 
> in /usr/bin.  In fact, I should rename it to cyglisp.dll, with a 
> corresponding /usr/lib/liblisp.dll.a, so that applications can link 
> against it with '-llisp'.  Would this solve the problem?

I'm not all that familiar with clisp.  Is there a single binary that
loads these dynamic modules, or multiple binaries?

> In retrospect, I should have made the new clisp a test release, to avoid 
> breaking things.  Sorry about that.

No worries.

--
Yaakov