Question about clisp version naming

[Yaakov Selkowitz]

On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 21:14 +0100, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Versioning
> 
> The way I read this, there is no suggestion of putting these extra
> version parts in or after the %dist and/or build number, which is what
> we use the release field for.

Obviously we don't have %dist, but did you continue reading to the
"Non-Numeric Version in Release" section?

--
Yaakov