Question about clisp version naming
Achim Gratz
Stromeko@nexgo.de
Fri Mar 13 19:36:00 GMT 2015
Achim Gratz writes:
> As you wish. I still think his view is somewhat unique looking at the
> version numbers in several Linux distros that provide packages
> in-between-official-releases from several VCS. The only case that I
> know where the VCS revision tag was used in the relase part of the
> version string was when the release was made from a local branch in all
> other cases they'd been appended to the latest release version string.
Here are a few examples from my Tumbleweed installation for illustration:
| grub2-x86_64-efi | 2.02~beta2-33.1 |
| libffi4-32bit | 4.8.3+r218481-2.1 |
| libiniparser0-32bit | 3.1.0.git20140619_c5beb80a-3.1 |
| liblockdev1-32bit | 1.0.3_git201003141408-29.2 |
| libspeex1-32bit | 1.1.999_1.2rc2-1.1 |
| shim | 0.7.318.81ee561d-9.1 |
| libx265-32 | 0.32hg20140928-2.10 |
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
SD adaptation for Waldorf rackAttack V1.04R1:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list