ffcall

[Reini Urban]

On 02/21/2015 04:44 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 2/19/2015 2:46 PM, Reini Urban wrote:
>> And the deal with the latest clisp 2.49 was that modules can be
>> dynaloaded.
>> If the gnulib steps would work. I never did for me. And I fixed most of
>> the other
>> module compilation problems before.
>
> But I just discovered that clisp-2.49 builds fine with the configure
> option --without-dynamic-modules.  Is there any reason not to do
> that?  After all, clisp-2.48 is built without dynamic modules, so
> what's the harm in doing the same for 2.49?

Technically this is the best.
But I never published 2.49 with this option, because there were not many
other changes.
So it's almost the same as 2.48 and my version was not as confusing.