[HEADSUP] Proposal for change in postinstall script handling (was Re: [RFC] incremental rebase)
Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com
Fri Nov 21 17:18:00 GMT 2014
On Nov 21 11:21, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > On Nov 19 12:38, Achim Gratz wrote:
> > > Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > > >> In any case, this is mainly about putting the mechanism in place or
> > > >> rather to specify it. Making it usable would require support from
> > > >> cygport and upset/genini.
> > > >
> > > > Not upset, it seems. IIUC the stratumification can firmly stay in
> > > > setup' s hands with some support from cygport. Upset wouldn't even
> > > > notice it.
> > >
> > > >> Using hidden groups (like the non-functional
> > > >> _PostInstallLast we already have) would be an obvious way to do that.
> > > >
> > > > Isn't that moot then? Stratum z would do it for free...
> > >
> > > In both cases the use of the prefix is what decides the stratum.
> > > Arguably that could be made explicit in setup.hint instead, but that
> > > would require extension of the data format and changes to tools that use
> > > the data. As long as we're manually assigning those strata (or farming
> > > this out into cygport) then no such support would be needed indeed.
> > >
> > > ANother question: setup is used by other projects it seems. How do we
> > > ensure they either agree with us or are unaffected by this change?
> > >
> > > > Makes sense. And the naming convention? No chance for collisions with
> > > > existing scripts?
> > >
> > > The Cygwin Package Search says that no such postinstall scripts
> > > currently exist, so I'd say we're GTG with the prefix idea.
> >
> > I'd like to have some more input here. Maintainers, if you have any
> > input to this, please follow up.
>
> I'm sorry - I didn't follow the previous discussion and am having trouble
> following this. Could you please restate what's being proposed?
It starts here: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2014-11/msg00064.html
Two major proposals on the plate:
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2014-11/msg00086.html
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2014-11/msg00098.html
HTH,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/attachments/20141121/00d6433a/attachment.sig>
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list