Fixing packages which rely on obsolete packages

Christopher Faylor
Mon Jun 24 12:40:00 GMT 2013

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:04:24AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jun 24 10:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jun 22 17:13, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 04:49:21PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > >I'm refreshing the procedure for updating setup.ini on sourceware as
>> > >part of moving 64-bit Cygwin out of beta and I came across this:
>> > >[...]
>> > Here's a similar list for 64-bit packages.  Apparently genini's error
>> > checking leaves something to be desired.  Obviously some of these are
>> > not obsolete.
>> Does that mean upset is already running all the time for 64 bit, or was
>> that only a test.  I'm asking because I'd like to know if we still have
>> to use GEN-sware after upload or not for the time being.
>Scratch that question.  Newly popping up md5.sum files are a rather
>good indication.

I don't know what you're inferring from md5.sum's but if I regenerated a
new setup64.ini, it was entirely by accident.

I'll send out a clear announcement when everything is working.

More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list