gettext packaging bug?
Thu Jun 13 02:50:00 GMT 2013
On 2013-06-12 14:08, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 6/12/2013 11:13 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> However, why is libintl.h in gettext, and not in gettext-devel?
>> A header file belongs in the devel package if there is one, isn't it?
> The upstream maintainer, Bruno Haible, strongly recommends certain
> conventions when packaging gettext. While we have to deviate from those
> recommendations somewhat for cygwin, I tried to adhere as closely as I
> could to them. See the attached PACKAGING file; what Bruno calls
> "gettext-tools" I've packaged as "gettext-devel" more or less, and what
> he calls "gettext-runtime" I've packaged as "gettext", with obvious
> exception that DLLs themselves all get their own package(s).
> However, in actuality, neither Bruno's "gettext-runtime" (our gettext)
> nor his "gettext-tools" (our gettext-devel) really represent a
> "traditional" runtime-vs-devel split.
> Note that this means all of the following:
> are actually in 'gettext' and *not* in gettext-devel.
IMO they really should be in the latter; if you're building a package
which uses l10n, you need it anyway for autopoint, msgfmt, etc.
More information about the Cygwin-apps