[RFU] serf-1.3.0-1

[Ken Brown]

On 7/24/2013 8:43 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 7/24/2013 4:55 PM, David Rothenberger wrote:
>> Please remove 0.7.1-2 and leave 1.2.1-1 as prev. You can also delete
>> the libserf0_1 and libserf0-devel directories.
>>
>> D=http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/x86
>> wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \
>>    ${D}/serf/libserf1_0/libserf1_0-1.3.0-1.tar.bz2 \
>>    ${D}/serf/libserf1_0/setup.hint \
>>    ${D}/serf/libserf1-devel/libserf1-devel-1.3.0-1.tar.bz2 \
>>    ${D}/serf/libserf1-devel/setup.hint \
>>    ${D}/serf/serf-1.3.0-1.tar.bz2 \
>>    ${D}/serf/serf-1.3.0-1-src.tar.bz2 \
>>    ${D}/serf/setup.hint
>>
>> D=http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/x86_64
>> wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \
>>    ${D}/serf/libserf1_0/libserf1_0-1.3.0-1.tar.bz2 \
>>    ${D}/serf/libserf1_0/setup.hint \
>>    ${D}/serf/libserf1-devel/libserf1-devel-1.3.0-1.tar.bz2 \
>>    ${D}/serf/libserf1-devel/setup.hint \
>>    ${D}/serf/serf-1.3.0-1.tar.bz2 \
>>    ${D}/serf/serf-1.3.0-1-src.tar.bz2 \
>>    ${D}/serf/setup.hint
>
> Done.  What about 1.2.0-1 on x86_64?  Should that be deleted?  And what
> about serf-debuginfo on both arches -- no 1.3.0-1?  Last question: On
> x86 (but not x86_64), you've made libserf1-devel obsolete in favor of
> libserf-devel, but there's no libserf-devel package.

I removed that setup.hint to prevent upset errors, and I replaced it 
with the setup.hint from x86_64 (after removing libexpat-devel, which 
doesn't exist on x86).

Ken