GCC maintainer volunteer?

[Christopher Faylor]

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:01:56AM +0800, JonY wrote:
>On 2/24/2013 09:39, Ken Brown wrote:
>
>> But isn't all this irrelevant for you?  There's no reason to keep gcc3
>> around anymore, is there?
>
>I don't know, I'll leave that to the core Cygwin devs to decide.

I'd be happy to get rid of it but don't people still use it?  We can't
have the gcc4 package overwriting someone's gcc3 if so.

cgf