Changing dependent library version numbers vs. test packages vs. requires: lines.

[Chris Sutcliffe]

On 4 February 2013 05:16, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I think we're now waiting for a sign of progress on GCC for too long.
> I don't think we can wait much longer.  If you're still happy to
> maintain Cygwin's GCC, please provide a new package within the next two
> weeks.  Otherwise, from my point of view GCC is up for grabs.

I believe it's been 2 weeks, any chance someone will lead the charge
and provide a new GCC?

Thanks,

Chris

-- 
Chris Sutcliffe
http://emergedesktop.org
http://www.google.com/profiles/ir0nh34d