Names for debug packages

[Ken Brown]

There's been discussion on the cygwin list about packages containing 
debug symbols, most recently in

   http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-02/threads.html#00536

where the consensus (I think) was that package maintainers could provide 
such packages if they wanted to.  I would like to provide a package 
containing debug symbols for emacs-*.exe, but I'm not sure what to call 
it.  The thread I just cited discussed *-debuginfo.  But since then 
Reini has released perl_debuginfo, and Corinna has released 
cygwin-debug.  Could/should we standardize these names?  I don't know 
whether to call my new package emacs-debuginfo, emacs_debuginfo, or 
emacs-debug.  My personal preference is the last one, simply because 
it's short.

Ken