OCaml category?

[Christopher Faylor]

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 09:31:08PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>On 2012-05-10 20:30, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> I see that there's an OCaml category in setup now.  Did I miss a
>> discussion which introduced an OCaml category?
>
>That would be my fault.  ocaml-llvm (a subpackage of llvm) was a 
>carry-over from Ports, where I do use that category to cover nearly 100 
>OCaml-related packages.  Would you like me to change this, and to what?

Maybe OCaml makes sense.  I was just surprised to see it, especially
since there only seemed to be one thing in it.

Does it fit in any existing category?

cgf