New rebase release

[Charles Wilson]

On 9/20/2011 11:24 AM, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:53:54PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> After the flurry of work and new features added to rebase in late
>> July/early August, any chance you could bump the version and roll a
>> new release?
> 
> Yes.  Should the next version be 4.0 or 3.1?  I recommend the former,
> since there has been many significant changes.

I agree: 4.0.

We could call it "rebase NT" for "New Technology" -- that is much better
than 3.1, which is merely a pretty wrapper around the same old
underlying cruft. :-)

Did anybody see the suggested new logo for the linux 3.1 kernel:
http://thehackernews.com/2011/09/suggested-linux-31-kernel-logo.html

--
Chuck