gcc4-core PACKAGE BUG

[Eric Blake]

On 08/14/2010 01:13 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 08:05:00PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> So I really don't think it's worth the end-user's while in this
>> instance, but I'd like to hear what Corinna and cgf think before I
>> proceed.
> 
> I'm with you on this, Dave.  Your reasonsing seems right to me.  I don't
> normally like to make silent changes to existing packages but in this
> case it seems like the least intrusive way to fix the problem.
> 
> I wouldn't even announce the change since that would probably generate
> some confusion.

My only worry now is if any mirrors will have a stale checksum that
doesn't correspond to the new tarball.  But I'm convinced that it's
worth trying the silent upgrade, now.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@redhat.com    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 619 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/attachments/20100814/23c5e6e2/attachment.sig>