[1.7] ITP: libassuan

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Nov  6 15:35, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Charles Wilson wrote:
> > libassuan is included in debian stable and testing:
> > http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libassuan
> > and Fedora 11
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/libassuan?#Fedora11
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/ITP-gnupg2/release/libassuan/libassuan-1.0.5-1-src.tar.bz2
> > http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/ITP-gnupg2/release/libassuan/libassuan-1.0.5-1.tar.bz2
> > http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/ITP-gnupg2/release/libassuan/libassuan-devel/libassuan-devel-1.0.5-1.tar.bz2
> > http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/ITP-gnupg2/release/libassuan/libassuan-devel/setup.hint
> > http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/ITP-gnupg2/release/libassuan/setup.hint
> > 
> > 
> > ====== libassuan-devel setup.hint =====
> > requires: libpth-devel
> > category: Devel Libs
> > external-source: libassuan
> > sdesc: "IPC library used by GnuPG2 (devel)"
> > ldesc: "Libassuan is the IPC library used by GnuPG2, GPGME
> > and a few other packages."
> > 
> > ====== libassuan setup.hint =====
> > requires: libassuan-devel
> > category: Doc
> > sdesc: "IPC library used by GnuPG2"
> > ldesc: "Libassuan is the IPC library used by GnuPG2, GPGME
> > and a few other packages."
> > 
> > OK?
> 
> Ping?

Packaging looks ok, but is it really necessary to have a libassuan package which only
provides the documentation which you then need if you install libassuan-devel?  I think
it would be simpler to haave only a libassuan-devel package.  Otherwise I'm wondering
if the requirements aren't upside down.  You require libassuan (the docs) if you install
libassuan-devel, but not vice versa...

Anyway, it's ok to upload as you prefer.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat