Sat Mar 21 12:03:00 GMT 2009
On Mar 21 11:21, Dave Korn wrote:
> Lapo Luchini wrote:
> > Dave Korn wrote:
> >>> BTW: this was compiled with gcc-3.4.4-999, should I reroll it with
> >>> gcc4-4.3.2-2?
> >> Well... given that nothing's using it yet, and it's for 1.7, why not save
> >> the hassle of an ABI break later?
> > Mhh... unfortunately that seems to break it.
> > (the test-suite executable just dies with error 128)
> > Also, the configure script doesn't accept overriding CXX, so I used
> > "alternatives" to change my default. Is there any problem in that approach?
> That's how I did it.
> > Also, trying strace on it fails with "The procedure entry point
> > __Unwind_Resume could not be located in the dynamic link library
> > cygwin1.dll" (I guess strace wasn't yet ported to cygwin-1.7?).
> Heh, that's a clue. __Unwind_Resume isn't in cygwin1.dll, it's in
> cyggcc_s-1.dll. We saw this before just recently: remove -lm and -lpthread
> from the final link.
A horse for a fix!
No, hang on, a kingdom for a horse!
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
More information about the Cygwin-apps