[RFU 1.5 and 1.7] libaprutil1-1.3.7

[David Rothenberger]

On 6/30/2009 1:30 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Here, the aprutil1 package still exists in the 1.7 release area, but
> I don't think it makes sense anymore, along the same lines as for
> libapr1.  I think it should be ok to remove it from the 1.7 release.
> What do you say?

The aprutil1 and apr1 packages are just transition packages to help 
people upgrade from the old package naming schema to the new one. They 
don't need to be in the 1.7 area if we believe everyone will have 
updated their apr1 and aprutil1 packages before they try to upgrade to 
1.7. I'm not sure that's true, though. It seems there are at least some 
people that only update once every 3-5 years. :-)

-- 
David Rothenberger  ----  daveroth@acm.org

"Gort, klaatu nikto barada."
                 -- The Day the Earth Stood Still